Uh, not really.
Bristol Palin and her fiance, Levi Johnston, have split despite plans to work together and raise their child, Tripp.
As a new mom (I gave birth to my son 3 weeks ago), I can vouch for the stress and strain a newborn baby can put on individuals not to mention the changed dynamic created in the couple’s relationship. Thankfully, my partner and I planned this baby for many years and the arrival of our son has allowed us to create a new bond and relish in this process. But, on countless occasions, I imagine what it would be like to have an unexpected, unplanned pregnancy. WHOA! I can’t begin to imagine the challenges and strain an event like that would out on a couple, especially a teen couple.
I don’t think the public is too surpsied to hear about this split. Upon announcing the obvious pregnancy, Sarah Palin proclaimed that the couple would get married and raise this child in a legitimate union, sanctioned by God and law. Somehow, this statement was meant to justify a teen pregnancy by a daughter born to a woman that does not believe in sex education, access to birth control or safe and legal abortion. Yet, Sarah Palin said the decision to have a child was a “choice” and that her daughter, Bristol, and the child’s father, Levi, would make the best of the situation.
I never believed that marriage was making the best decision for this couple. But, it’s a clear example to all of those individuals that felt it was the appropriate solution and applauded it that life for these two teens is not what Sarah Palin predicted it would be.
From Bristol’s recent statement, it sounds like choice was not in the equation from start to finish.
Bristol also said that “everyone should be abstinent but it’s not realistic… [sex] is more and more accepted among kids my age.”
Bristol also warned about the dangers of teen pregnancy and said that she should have waited 10 years before having children.
